Inquiry 55 (4):405-430 (2012)
Abstract What do we mean to say when we call some person a good business manager? And where do the criteria flow from by which we judge people good business managers? I answer these questions by drawing on von Wright's distinction between several varieties of goodness. We can then discriminate between instrumental, technical and moral senses of the expression ?to be a good business manager?. The first two senses presume that business managers have a characteristic task or that they engage in typical activities. It is natural to specify this task and these activities by appealing to goods and to the good of a business. These goods may then be identified as goods for people. Insofar as the welfare of people is of moral value, we obtain a morally loaded account of business management. I argue against this account and plead for a more sober understanding of economic goods and of the good of a business. The latter can be understood in analogy to the good of an individual person, but is largely determined by the goals of the founders and owners. Economic goods are things that are wanted by some people and thus exchanged on markets. If this is so, then there is no direct conceptual path from instrumentally or technically good business managers to morality even though there are certain affinities. To conclude, I trace the consequences for our understanding of business ethics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action.Joseph Raz - 1999 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance.James Griffin - 1986 - Clarendon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Good Manager – a Moral Manager?Per Sundman - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (3):247 - 254.
The Common Good of Business: Addressing a Challenge Posed by «Caritas in Veritate». [REVIEW]Alejo José G. Sison & Joan Fontrodona - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 100 (S1):99-107.
Two Views of Business Ethics: A Popular Philosophical Approach and a Value Based Interdisciplinary One. [REVIEW]Sherwin Klein - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):71 - 79.
Interorganizational Ethics: Standards of Behavior. [REVIEW]Jerold B. Muskin - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (4):283 - 297.
The Role of Character in Business Ethics.Edwin M. Hartman - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (3):547-559.
Profit Maximization: The Ethical Mandate of Business. [REVIEW]Patrick Primeaux & John Stieber - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):287 - 294.
Perceptions of Business Ethics: Students Vs. Business People. [REVIEW]Barbara C. Cole & Dennie L. Smith - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (8):889 - 896.
Virtue as a Benchmark for Spirituality in Business.Gerald F. Cavanagh & Mark R. Bandsuch - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):109 - 117.
Common Good Leadership in Business Management: An Ethical Model From the Indian Tradition.John M. Alexander & Jane Buckingham - 2011 - Business Ethics 20 (4):317-327.
Ethics and Governance: Business as Mediating Institution.Timothy L. Fort - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Vocational Virtue Ethics: Prospects for a Virtue Ethic Approach to Business.David McPherson - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (2):283-296.
Defining 'Business Ethics': Like Nailing Jello to a Wall. [REVIEW]Phillip V. Lewis - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (5):377 - 383.
Is There “No Such Thing as Business Ethics”?Eric H. Beversluis - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):81 - 88.
Business Ethical Perceptions of Business People in East China.Xinwen Wu - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3):541-558.
Added to index2012-06-21
Total downloads9 ( #458,054 of 2,158,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,837 of 2,158,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?