Varieties of Goodness at Work: The Relationship between Business and Morality

Abstract
Abstract What do we mean to say when we call some person a good business manager? And where do the criteria flow from by which we judge people good business managers? I answer these questions by drawing on von Wright's distinction between several varieties of goodness. We can then discriminate between instrumental, technical and moral senses of the expression ?to be a good business manager?. The first two senses presume that business managers have a characteristic task or that they engage in typical activities. It is natural to specify this task and these activities by appealing to goods and to the good of a business. These goods may then be identified as goods for people. Insofar as the welfare of people is of moral value, we obtain a morally loaded account of business management. I argue against this account and plead for a more sober understanding of economic goods and of the good of a business. The latter can be understood in analogy to the good of an individual person, but is largely determined by the goals of the founders and owners. Economic goods are things that are wanted by some people and thus exchanged on markets. If this is so, then there is no direct conceptual path from instrumentally or technically good business managers to morality even though there are certain affinities. To conclude, I trace the consequences for our understanding of business ethics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2012.696352
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,174
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action.Joseph Raz - 1999 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
The Language of Morals.R. M. Hare - 1952 - Oxford Clarendon Press.
The Right and the Good.W. D. Ross - 1930 - Clarendon Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Good Manager – a Moral Manager?Per Sundman - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (3):247 - 254.
Interorganizational Ethics: Standards of Behavior. [REVIEW]Jerold B. Muskin - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (4):283 - 297.
The Role of Character in Business Ethics.Edwin M. Hartman - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (3):547-559.
Virtue as a Benchmark for Spirituality in Business.Gerald F. Cavanagh & Mark R. Bandsuch - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):109 - 117.
Is There “No Such Thing as Business Ethics”?Eric H. Beversluis - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):81 - 88.
Business Ethical Perceptions of Business People in East China.Xinwen Wu - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3):541-558.
Added to PP index
2012-06-21

Total downloads
9 ( #468,508 of 2,180,187 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #304,927 of 2,180,187 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums