Uneasy sacrifice: The politics of United States famine relief, 1945–48 [Book Review]

Agriculture and Human Values 11 (4):4-18 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The United States, which committed itself to alleviating the severe post-World War II global famine, failed to meet its relief commitments. Relief efforts failed largely because voluntary attempts at reducing consumption proved too difficult, and the U. S. government refused to return to mandatory rationing of food despite evidence indicating the majority of Americans, especially American women, would have welcomed such a move. Contributing to officials' opposition to mandatory post-war rationing were the revived ideology of government non-interference; a strong government/agriculture alliance; the focus on private, as opposed to public, interests and obligations; and increasing Cold War tensions precluding any worldwide efforts at famine relief. It seemed only the fear of Communist takeover could provoke Congress in partnership with business interests into sufficiently alleviating famine conditions, but only for those countries willing to abide by U. S. terms

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Famine Ethics.Olivier Rubin - 2019 - Food Ethics 4 (2):123-138.
The Immorality of Having Children.Stuart Rachels - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):567-582.
Coding Famine: Famine Relief and the British Raj in Rudyard Kipling’s ‘William the Conqueror’.Sumangala Bhattacharya - 2007 - Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 36 (2):333-360.
Matters of life and death.Tom L. Beauchamp & Tom Regan (eds.) - 1980 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
A History of the China International Famine Relief Commission.C. S. G. & Andrew James Nathan - 1965 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 85 (4):609.
The moral perplexities of famine relief.Onora O'Neill - 1980 - In Tom L. Beauchamp & Tom Regan (eds.), Matters of life and death. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Food aid and the famine relief argument (brief return).Paul B. Thompson - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):209-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
92 (#182,346)

6 months
2 (#1,445,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

War without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War.John W. Dower - 1987 - Science and Society 51 (4):495-497.
Correspondence.Richard L. Hoover, Joe Gieck & Lynn Regudon - 1980 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 8 (1):17-18.

Add more references