St. Thomas Aquinas on Impairment, Natural Goods, and Human Flourishing
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (2):311-328 (2020)
Abstract
This essay examines St. Thomas Aquinas’s views on different types of impairment. Aquinas situates physical and moral impairments in a teleological account of the human species, and these impairments are made relative in light of our ultimate flourishing in God. For Aquinas, moral and spiritual impairments are of primary significance. Drawing on Philippa Foot’s account of natural goods, we describe what constitutes an impairment for Aquinas. In the Thomistic sense, an impairment is a lack or privation in relation to that which is appropriate to the human being, known by our nature and ultimate perfection. For Aquinas, perfection lies in the transformation necessary for union with God.Author's Profile
DOI
10.5840/ncbq202020229
My notes
Similar books and articles
Are Persons with Profound Intellectual Disabilities Sacramental Icons of Heavenly Life? Aquinas on Impairment.John Berkman - 2013 - Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (1):83-96.
Thomas Aquinas and the New Natural Law Theory on the Object of the Human Act.Kevin L. Flannery - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):79-104.
Thomas Aquinas on Natural Inclinations and the Practical Cognition of Human Goods.Justin Matchulat - 2020 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):239-271.
The New Natural Law School's Comment on the Theory of Man's Ultimate End in Thomas Aquinas.Qing-hua Lin - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (3):169-179.
A Thomistic, Non-Ableist Conception of Impairment and Disability.Bryan R. Cross - 2020 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (2):233-242.
St. Thomas’s Natural Law Theory.E. Christian Brugger - 2019 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 19 (2):181-202.
St. Thomas and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Michael Augros & Christopher Oleson - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (4):637-661.
St. Thomas Aquinas and John Locke on Natural Law.Ginna M. Pennance-Acevedo - 2017 - Studia Gilsoniana 6 (2):221–248.
Aquinas and the Human Desire for Knowledge.Jan A. Aertsen - 2005 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):411-430.
Natural Law and Business Ethics.Manuel Velasquez & F. Neil Brady - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (2):83-107.
Fundamental Errors of the New Natural Law Theory.Steven A. Long - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):105-132.
The First Principles of Natural Law a Study of the Moral Theories of Aristotle and Saint Thomas Aquinas. --.Maria Theresa Carl - 1990 - University Microfilms International.
Is the New Natural Law Thomistic?Michael Pakaluk - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):57-68.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-17
Downloads
10 (#890,548)
6 months
3 (#227,001)
2020-11-17
Downloads
10 (#890,548)
6 months
3 (#227,001)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Disability, Enhancement, and Flourishing.Jason T. Eberl - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (5):597-611.