Future Medicine: Towards a More Conscious and Ethical Communication

In Simona Chiodo, David Kaiser, Julie Shah & Paolo Volonté (eds.), Improving Technology Through Ethics. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 29-38 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Over the past decade, the integration of nanotechnology into medicine, known as nanomedicineNanomedicine, has revolutionized diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, offering potential solutions for currently incurable diseases. Cutting-edge approaches such as gene therapy, the use of nucleic acids as therapeutic agents, and the use of nano systems as shuttles for drug delivery have garnered significant attention in the research community. Some of these nano-therapies have even reached clinical application, transitioning from the realm of specialized experts to benefiting the general public, patients, and their families. However, these advancements have also raised ethical and social concerns, as particularly highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has evidenced how the introduction of novel medical techniques prompted critical questions surrounding ethics, transparency, and human dignity. The manner in which nanotechnology research and applications are introduced to society, the ethical responsibility of professionals, and the way health and social issues are addressed can greatly impact public trust and the future of medical innovation. This chapter aims to analyze and emphasize the importance of ethicsEthics and transparent communicationCommunication in medical innovation, as well as the crucial role of scientists, researchers, and doctors in understanding their ethical and social responsibilities and the influential power their opinions hold in society. By fostering credible communication, it is possible to shape a fair and transparent progress while mitigating public fear, prejudice, and backlash. Effective and simple communication, along with the utmost respect for the well-being of humans and animals throughout all stages of research development, should shape the future of medicine.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can the Future-Like-Ours Argument Survive Ontological Scrutiny?Matthew Adams & Nicholas Rimell - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (5):667-680.
Bio-X: Removing Bodily Contingency in Regenerative Medicine.Eugene Thacker - 2002 - Journal of Medical Humanities 23 (3/4):239-253.
Intensive Care Ethics in Evolution.Katherine Hall - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (3-4):241-245.
“Nanoethic”?: What's New?Paul Litton - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (1):22-25.
Judging the future: Whose fault will it be?Daniel Callahan - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):677 – 687.
Reconsidering the role of language in medicine.Berkeley Franz & John W. Murphy - 2018 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 13 (1):5.
Pain and communication.Stan van Hooft - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):255-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references