Scientific progress: The principle of dialectical correspondence

Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 12:111-121 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

For keeping truth in truthmaking.Fraser MacBride - 2013 - Analysis 73 (4):686-695.
The Role of Justification in the Ordinary Concept of Scientific Progress.Moti Mizrahi & Wesley Buckwalter - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):151-166.
What is Scientific Progress? Lessons from Scientific Practice.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (2):375-390.
Heuristics and the generalized correspondence principle.Hans Radder - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):195-226.
Correspondence rules.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (3):280-290.
What is scientific progress?Alexander Bird - 2007 - Noûs 41 (1):64–89.
What Scientific Progress Is Not: Against Bird’s Epistemic View.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):241-255.
Progress as a demarcation criterion for the sciences.Paul M. Quay - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (2):154-170.
Studies in dialectical materialism.G. Healy - 1982 - London: Workers Revolutionary Party.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-17

Downloads
16 (#901,783)

6 months
1 (#1,461,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references