Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):146-151 (1994)

Abstract
In the past few years considerable attention has been given to a relatively new method of prenatal diagnosis known as chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Because CVS can be performed in the first trimester it is hailed by many as a significant advance over amniocentesis. What has not been as publicized, however, are the disadvantages of CVS and earlier prenatal diagnosis. The emotional costs of CVS in terms of the greater number of both spontaneous and selective abortions following CVS, the use of CVS for sex selection and, because of the greater social acceptability of first trimester abortion, the possibility of increased pressure on women to undergo prenatal diagnosis by health insurance companies, medical professionals and government agencies, all need to be weighed against the advantages of early prenatal diagnosis
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.20.3.146
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,408
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Abortion: For the Fetus's Own Sake?Paul F. Camenisch - 1976 - Hastings Center Report 6 (2):38-41.
How Much Do We Want to Know About the Unborn?Marc Lappe - 1973 - Hastings Center Report 3 (1):8-9.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Autonomy and Freedom of Choice in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
A New Era in Prenatal Testing: Are We Prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Genetic Counseling and Termination of Pregnancy in Hungary.Zoltan Papp - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):323-333.
Prenatal Diagnosis: Whose Right?D. Heyd - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (5):292-297.
Prenatal Diagnosis and Discrimination Against the Disabled.L. Gillam - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):163-171.
Prenatal Diagnosis: Confronting the Ethical Issues.V. N. Bolton - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):218-219.
Brueckner and Fischer on the Evil of Death.Huiyuhl Yi - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):295-303.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
18 ( #567,768 of 2,420,817 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #87,919 of 2,420,817 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes