American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):43-47 (2003)
This Report examines the ethical implications of electronic communication, focusing on the use of electronic mail (e-mail), considers its impact on a previously established patient-physician relationship, and the limitations in using e-mail to create a new patient-physician relationship. In its recommendations, this report offers guidance to physicians who use electronic mail to communicate with patients and online users. These guidelines maintain that e-mail should not be used to establish a patient-physician relationship, but rather to supplement personal encounters. When using e-mail, physicians hold the same ethical responsibilities to their patients as they do during other encounters and that information must be presented in a manner that meets professional standards. The report requires that physicians notify patients of e-mail's inherent limitations and that patients be given the opportunity to accept these limitations prior to the communication of privileged information. Finally, physicians should be aware of privacy and confidentiality concerns when using e-mail to communicate with patients
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Surrogate Decision Making 2.0: Digital Evidence as Clinical Testimony.Lance Wahlert - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):34-36.
Similar books and articles
A Study of Individuals' Ethical Beliefs and Perceptions of Electronic Mail Privacy.James J. Cappel - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (10):819 - 827.
Electronic Mail and Listservs: Effective Journalistic Ethical Fora?Thomas E. Ruggiero - 2001 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (4):293 – 304.
Ethical and Legal Issues in E-Mail Therapy.Daniel Edward Shapiro & Charles Eric Schulman - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (2):107 – 124.
Ethical, Legal and Economic Aspects of Employer Monitoring of Employee Electronic Mail.Thomas J. Hodson, Fred Englander & Valerie Englander - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):99 - 108.
Physicians, Patients and Confidentiality: The Role of Physicians in Electronic Health Records.Lee Black & Emily Anderson - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):50-51.
The Futures of Physicians: Agency and Autonomy Reconsidered.J. Warren Salmon, William White & Joe Feinglass - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (4).
Attitudes of Rhode Island Primary Care Physicians Toward the Use of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer.Frances M. Alexakos - 2003 - Dissertation, Salve Regina University
Doctors and Patients: Partners or Adversaries? [REVIEW]Eugene J. Stein - 1980 - Bioethics Quarterly 2 (2):118-122.
Prescribing Viagra in an Ethically Responsible Fashion.Eugene V. Boisaubin & Laurence B. McCullough - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):739 – 749.
The Patient's Duty to Adhere to Prescribed Treatment: An Ethical Analysis.David B. Resnik - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):167 – 188.
Professional Autonomy in Belgium.Herman Nys & Paul Schotsmans - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):425-439.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads5 ( #603,796 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?