Fetish-Oriented Ontology

Open Philosophy 3 (1):298-313 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In her essay, “After de Brosses” (2017), Rosalind C. Morris briefly considers the historical importance of the concept of the fetish on the relatively recent movements of new materialism, but she does not engage with Speculative Realism and Object-Oriented Ontology. This essay addresses this gap and focuses on the influence of the fetish on Speculative Realism and Object-Oriented Ontology by focusing on Graham Harman’s conception of objects and Quentin Meillassoux’s theory of arche-fossils. In short, I am offering a posthumanist theorization of the fetish in order to argue that Object-Oriented Ontology can be considered, at points, to be a fetish-oriented ontology and that this notion of the fetish allows us to think about philosophical considerations of objects in a new light.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Weird Reality, Aesthetics, and Vitality in Education.Sevket Benhur Oral - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 34 (5):459-474.
Being (with) Objects.Anna E. Mudde - 2017 - In Marie-Eve Morin (ed.), Continental Realism and its Discontents. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ontological Ground of Fetish of Money.Li Zhi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 17:381-392.
A Theory of Everything? [REVIEW]Steven Umbrello - 2018 - Cultural Studies Review 24 (2):184-186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-25

Downloads
23 (#637,895)

6 months
8 (#274,950)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?