Infinite regress arguments are used by philosophers as methods of refutation. A hypothesis is defective if it generates an infinite series when either such a series does not exist or its supposed existence would not serve the explanatory purpose for which it was postulated
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Viciousness and the Structure of Reality.Ricki Bliss - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):399-418.
The Sceptic's Tools: Circularity and Infinite Regress.Jan Willem Wieland - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):359-369.
On Gratton's Infinite Regress Arguments. [REVIEW]Jan Willem Wieland - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):107-113.
Self-Awareness (Svasaṃvedana) and Infinite Regresses: A Comparison of Arguments by Dignāga and Dharmakīrti.Birgit Kellner - 2011 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):411-426.
And So On. Two Theories of Regress Arguments in Philosophy.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Ghent University.
Non-Dualism, Infinite Regress Arguments and the “Weak Linguistic Principle”.S. Weber - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (2):148-157.
Simple Heuristics: From One Infinite Regress to Another?Aidan Feeney - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):749-750.
Taking Tense Seriously in Differentiating Past and Future.William Lane Craig - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):451-456.
Added to index2010-10-01
Total downloads112 ( #41,513 of 2,146,876 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #226,179 of 2,146,876 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.