Law and Philosophy 36 (4):419-468 (2017)

Authors
Alexander Brown
University of East Anglia
Abstract
The issue of hate speech has received significant attention from legal scholars and philosophers alike. But the vast majority of this attention has been focused on presenting and critically evaluating arguments for and against hate speech bans as opposed to the prior task of conceptually analysing the term ‘hate speech’ itself. This two-part article aims to put right that imbalance. It goes beyond legal texts and judgements and beyond the legal concept hate speech in an attempt to understand the general concept hate speech. And it does so using a range of well-known methods of conceptual analysis that are distinctive of analytic philosophy. One of its main aims is to explode the myth that emotions, feelings, or attitudes of hate or hatred are part of the essential nature of hate speech. It also argues that hate speech is best conceived as a family resemblances concept. One important implication is that when looking at the full range of ways of combating hate speech, including but not limited to the use of criminal law, there is every reason to embrace an understanding of hate speech as a heterogeneous collection of expressive phenomena. Another is that it would be unsound to reject hate speech laws on the premise that they are effectively in the business of criminalising emotions, feelings, or attitudes of hate or hatred.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-017-9297-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

I.—A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address.J. L. Austin - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 (1):1-30.
Contempt as a Moral Attitude.Michelle Mason - 2003 - Ethics 113 (2):234-272.
Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?Caleb Yong - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Differentiating Hate Speech: A Systemic Discrimination Approach.Katharine Gelber - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
Differentiating Hate Speech: A Systemic Discrimination Approach.Katharine Gelber - 2021 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24 (4):393-414.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dignity, Harm, and Hate Speech.Robert Mark Simpson - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (6):701-728.
Hate Speech, Dignity and Self-Respect.Jonathan Seglow - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5):1103-1116.
Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?Caleb Yong - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.
On Racist Hate Speech and the Scope of a Free Speech Principle.Mary Kate McGowan & Ishani Maitra - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):343-372.
Understanding and Regulating Hate Speech: A Symposium on Jeremy Waldron’s The Harm in Hate Speech.[author unknown] - 2014 - Contemporary Political Theory 13 (1):88-109.
Expressive Interest and the Integrity of Hate Speakers.Andres Moles - 2010 - Politics in Central Europe 6 (3):18-38.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-03-20

Total views
121 ( #91,511 of 2,463,149 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #71,077 of 2,463,149 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes