St. Thomas’s Natural Law Theory

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 19 (2):181-202 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fifty years of debate have strengthened Germain Grisez’s 1965 interpretation of St. Thomas Aquinas’s famous article on the natural law in Summa theologiae I-II.94.2. Revisiting Grisez’s argument in light of these developments reveals that his “gerundive interpretation” of the first principle of practical reason is not only Thomistic, but essentially Aquinas’s interpretation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the New Natural Law Thomistic?Michael Pakaluk - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):57-67.
Thomas Aquinas and the New Natural Law Theory on the Object of the Human Act.Kevin L. Flannery - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):79-104.
St. Thomas Aquinas and the Natural Law.Steven A. Long - 2023 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 23 (4):577-601.
On the Transcendence of the Political Common Good.John Goyette - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):133-155.
Fundamental Errors of the New Natural Law Theory.Steven A. Long - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):105-131.
Is there a Punishment for Violating the Natural Law?Scott J. Roniger - 2020 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):273-304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-01

Downloads
30 (#521,169)

6 months
4 (#1,005,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references