Contradictions in the Concept of Professional Culpability

Health Care Analysis 15 (2):137-152 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Increasing recognition of adverse events in health care is wide spread. Implementing improved system arrangements, which prevent adverse events taking place rather than focussing on individual culpability is increasingly being recognised as a more effective preventative strategy. But does such a perspective mean individual health practitioners remain accountable for their practice? This article explores the philosophical, psychological and professional contradictions inherent in attempting to understand where the responsibility for our actions lies and concludes by arguing that while the case for the system approach to adverse event reduction is strong, the notion of individual professional culpability needs to be maintained

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Professional autonomy in the health care system.John J. Polder & Henk Jochemsen - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):477-491.
Alert or Alarm - Adverse Events in Health Care.Anne Moates - 2004 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 10 (1):4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
19 (#793,450)

6 months
5 (#837,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Oxford dictionary of philosophy.Simon Blackburn - 1996 - Oxford ;: Oxford University Press.
Free will: a very short introduction.Thomas Pink - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Identity: conversations with Benedetto Vecchi.Zygmunt Bauman - 2004 - Malden, MA: Polity Press. Edited by Benedetto Vecchi.

View all 14 references / Add more references