Code as speech: A discussion of Bernstein V. USDOJ, karn V. USDOS, and junger V. Daley in light of the U.s. Supreme court's recent shift to federalism [Book Review]

The purpose of this paper is to address the question of whethercomputer source code is speech protected by the First Amendmentto the United States Constitution or whether it is merelyfunctional, a ``machine'', designed to fulfill a set task andtherefore bereft of protection. The answer to this question is acomplex one. Unlike all other forms of ``speech'' computer sourcecode holds a unique place in the law: it can be copyrighted, likea book and it can be patented like a machine or process.Case law, intellectual property law and encryption exportregulations all reflect this contradictory dichotomy.
Keywords BSD   GPL   UCITA   artistic license   code   cryptography policy   democracy   encryption   free software   governance   intellectual property   law   liability   open source   source code   speech
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1011427806551
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,370
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
12 ( #386,601 of 2,193,887 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #291,271 of 2,193,887 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature