What Distinguishes Human Understanding? [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 57 (2):399-401 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central question of this book is “whether there is a qualitative difference in kind separating human understanding from the ‘understanding’ or intelligence of other animal species, or merely a quantitative difference of complexity and degree?” Deely attempts to answer this question by presenting an exposition “in the semiotics of the cognitive activity of organisms”. This book, therefore, is an analysis of semiotics in the cognitive activities of sensation, perception, and understanding. Three characteristics best describe Deely’s analysis: historically piercing, philosophically avant-garde, and successful. Deely successfully penetrates into the crux of our humanity. In doing so Deely’s semiotic theory also addresses the enduring philosophical debate over metaphysical realism versus idealism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What distinguishes human understanding?John Deely - 2002 - South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press.
Basics of Semiotics. [REVIEW]James Bernard Murphy - 1991 - Review of Metaphysics 44 (4):836-837.
Analogy and the Semiotic Animal.Christopher S. Morrissey - 2016 - American Journal of Semiotics 32 (1/4):49-78.
Realism for the 21st Century: A John Deely Reader.Paul Cobley (ed.) - 2009 - University of Scranton Press.
Semiotic Animal on the Path of Evolutionary Love.Farouk Y. Seif - 2016 - American Journal of Semiotics 32 (1/4):127-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
27 (#578,523)

6 months
5 (#838,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernie Cantens
Moravian College

Citations of this work

From semiosis to semioethics.John Deely - 2008 - Sign Systems Studies 36 (2):437-489.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references