Between division and continuity: Thresholds, boundaries and perspectives as territories of ambiguity

Technoetic Arts 13 (3):359-367 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Renaissance perspective represents the three-dimensional space onto a bi-dimensional one. This cultural construction, which unifies real and virtual, like all simulations, has some limitations – the main one is that it only works from a precise viewpoint that rules the illusion. When moving away from this position the illusion becomes imperfect. Similar to physics, where reality depends on the observer’s position, perspective depends on the viewer’s position. Since perspective has been inherited by photography, cinema, video, computer images, virtual reality, 3D videogames, we live in a perspective-based culture. In perception the boundaries between opposite qualities are often blurred and even indistinguishable. A screen is generally considered as rectangular, but it can be viewed as really rectangular only from its central perpendicular axis, at the crossing of the diagonals. When moving from this position it should appear as trapezoidal, but people still say it is rectangular: because they see it as rectangular or because they know it is rectangular? This threshold between vision and knowledge is imperceptible and obscure. Something similar happens with the senses. They are considered as separate entities: touch, hear, sight, smell and taste are described as distinct ways to detect the phenomenal world. But they are intermingled; the boundaries that are supposed to separate them are apparent: they are logically separable but not separate. The sensorial system is a cohesive and interrelated continuum where the senses act in synergy with each other. Continuity and discreteness, indistinguishability and distinction, inseparability and division are qualities to individuate, describe, classify and/or communicate the phenomena. These qualities are both theoretical and technical, since they depend on the general perspective of the analysis, on the goals to pursue, on the scale at which the phenomena are observed and on the accuracy of the instruments that are used.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Restoring ambiguity to Achinstein's account of evidence.Steven Gimbel - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):269-285.
An investigation of the "randomness" of threshold measurements.Michael Wertheimer - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (5):294.
Characterising Near Continuity Constructively.Douglas Bridges & Luminiţa Vîţă - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (4):535-538.
Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries.Barry Smith & Achille C. Varzi - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):401-420.
The difference between monaural and binaural thresholds.W. A. Shaw, E. B. Newman & I. J. Hirsh - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (3):229.
New perspectives about Nature and life.Pier Luigi Capucci - 2014 - Technoetic Arts 12 (2):375-387.
Rethinking pluralism: ritual, experience, and ambiguity.Adam B. Seligman - 2012 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Robert P. Weller.
Teoria dei territori.Andrea Mubi Brighenti - 2013 - Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 25 (48).

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-03

Downloads
23 (#679,329)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references