Carnapian rationality

Synthese 194 (1):163-184 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is generally thought that Carnap’s principle of tolerance cannot be integrated into a coherent overall conception of rationality. The doubts come from many sides, of which two are singled out. This paper argues that both are wrong, and that Carnapian rationality is a viable and perhaps quite interesting program for further development.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-01

Downloads
113 (#161,502)

6 months
9 (#355,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

A. W. Carus
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

How Tolerant Can You Be? Carnap on Rationality.Florian Steinberger - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (3):645-668.
Vienna circle.Thomas Uebel - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Logical empiricists on race.Liam Kofi Bright - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 65 (C):9-18.
Carnap, Explication, and Social History.James Pearson - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (4):741-774.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

View all 42 references / Add more references