David Kaplan and Richard Montague. A paradox regained. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 1 , pp. 79–90. - Martin Gardner. A new prediction paradox. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 13 , p. 51. - K. R. Popper. A comment on the new prediction paradox. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 13 , p. 51 [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):102-103 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2270600

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review: David Kaplan, Richard Montague, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic: A Paradox Regained; Martin Gardner, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science: A New Prediction Paradox; K. R. Popper, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science:A Comment on the New Prediction Paradox. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):102-103.
Karl R. Popper. Two autonomous axiom systems for the calculus of probabilities. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 51–57. - K. R. Popper. Errata. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 176. - K. R. Popper. Corrigendum. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 351. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):349-349.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
B. Meltzer. The third possibility. Mind, n.s. vol. 73 , pp. 430–433. - B. Meltzer and I. J. Good. Two forms of the prediction paradox. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 16 no. 61 , pp. 50–51. - William H. Halberstadt. In defence of Euclid: A reply to B. Meltzer. Mind, n.s. vol. 76 , p. 282. [REVIEW]Alan Ross Anderson - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):458-459.
Popper Karl R.. Degree of confirmation. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , pp. 143–149.Popper K. R.. Errata and corrigenda. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , p. 359. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):304-305.
Shaw R.. The paradox of the unexpected examination. Mind, n.s. vol. 67 , pp. 382–384.Lyon Ardon. The prediction paradox. Mind, n.s. vol. 68 , pp. 510–517.Nerlich G. C.. Unexpected examinations and unprovable statements. Mind, n.s. vol. 70 , pp. 503–513.Medlin Brian. The unexpected examination. American philosophical quarterly , vol. 1 no. 1 , pp. 66–72. See Corrigenda, Brian Medlin. The unexpected examination. American philosophical quarterly , vol. 1 no. 1 , p. 333.)Fitch Frederic B.. A Goedelized formulation of the prediction paradox. American philosophical quarterly , vol. 1 no. 1 , pp. 161–164. [REVIEW]Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):101-102.
Thomas Ivo. Independence of Faris-rejection-axioms. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 1 , pp. 48–51.Hugues Leblanc - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (1):113-113.
Robert L. Martin. Toward a solution to the liar paradox. The philosophical review, vol. 76, pp. 279–311. - Robert L. Martin. On Grelling's paradox. The philosophical review, vol. 77 , pp. 321–331. - Bas C. van Fraassen. Presupposition, implication, and self-reference. The journal of philosophy, vol. 65 , pp. 136–152. - Brian Skyrms. Return of the liar: three-valued logic and the concept of truth. American philosophical quarterly, vol. 7 , pp. 153–161. - Robert L. Martin. Preface. The paradox of the liar, edited by Robert L. Martin, Yale University Press, New Haven and London 1970, p. vii. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (4):584-587.
Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. Comments on ‘Degree of confirmation’ by Professor K. R. Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 155–157. - Karl R. Popper. ‘Content’ and ‘degree of confirmation’: A reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 157–163. - Rudolf Carnap. Remarks on Popper's note on content and degree of confirmation. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 243–244. - K. R. Popper. Reply to Professor Carnap. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 244–245. - Y. Bar-Hillel. Further comments on probability and confirmation. A rejoinder to Professor Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 245–248. - K.R.Popper. Adequacy and consistency: A second reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 249–256. - Peter Achinstein. The identity hypothesis. The British Journal for the philosophy of science,. [REVIEW]Harry V. Stopes-Roe - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):142-146.
A comment on the new prediction paradox.K. R. Popper - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (49):51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
20 (#761,609)

6 months
5 (#838,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Cargile
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox.Ken Levy - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references