Montesquieu's philosophy of punishment

History of Political Thought 19 (2):213-240 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In spite of his stature as a major figure in the history of political philosophy and his strong interest in the correlation between liberty and the content of criminal law, surprisingly little has been written concerning Montesquieu's views on crime and punishment. Even less has been written about his views on the philosophical justification of punishment. Unlike Locke, Rousseau and Beccaria, he did not use social contract theory to justify punishment. Close analysis of Books VI and XII of The Spirit of Laws (1748) reveals that he combined utilitarian, retributivist and liberal themes in his approach to punishment, while locating the fundamental justification for the right to punish capital crimes in the retributivist rationale of doing justice. As noted by Beccaria and numerous others whom he influenced, moderation in punishments and decriminalization of religious offences were key themes in his discussions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Bradley a retributivist?Thom Brooks - 2011 - History of Political Thought 32 (1):83-95.
German Idealism and the Concept of Punishment.Jean-Christophe Merle - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant on Why Criminal Offenders Must Be Punished.Mark Pickering - 2022 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 60 (4):637-663.
Is Hegel a Retributivist?Thom Brooks - 2004 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 25 (1-2):113-126.
A Critical Assessment of Odera Oruka’s Theory of Punishment.Jacinta Mwende Maweu - 2012 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 4 (2):97-108.
Collective crime and collective punishment.Jeff McMahan - 2008 - Criminal Justice Ethics 27 (1):4-12.
Justice and punishment: the rationale of coercion.Matt Matravers - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
40 (#410,325)

6 months
3 (#1,046,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Montesquieu's natural rights constitutionalism.Paul A. Rahe - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):51-81.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references