Whose values? Whose reasons? A commentary on ‘Rethinking disease: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’ by Powell and Scarffe

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9):592-593 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this short commentary, I reflect on the new definition of disease proposed by Powell and Scarffe. I suggest that the method they appeal to as objective, namely, rational justification, is open to several criticisms, which I outline and discuss.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

We should eliminate the concept of disease from mental health.Nicholas Agar - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9):591-591.
Making concepts work.Rosalind J. McDougall - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9):569-570.
On the place of fuzzy health in medical theory.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):639 – 649.
Havi Carel and Rachel Cooper Health, Illness, and Disease: Philosophical Essays.Shane N. Glackin - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (2):413-417.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-17

Downloads
29 (#538,060)

6 months
6 (#701,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Havi Carel
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

Making concepts work.Rosalind J. McDougall - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9):569-570.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references