The role of apperception in Kant's transcendental deduction of the categories
Noûs 24 (1):147-157 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.2307/2215618
My notes
Similar books and articles
Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Deducing the Categories of Modality and Relation - Reich Revisited.Dennis Schulting - 2008 - In Valerio Rohden, Riccardo Terra & Guido de Almeida (eds.), Akten des 10. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. de Gruyter. pp. 691--702.
Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's reading of Kant's transcendental deduction.Henry E. Allison - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):67 – 80.
Peirce, Kant, and Apel on Transcendental Semiotics: The Unity of Apperception and the Deduction of the Categories of Signs.Jerrold J. Abrams - 2004 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (4):627 - 677.
Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction.Robert Hanna - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
Necessity and possibility: The logical strategy of Kant's critique of pure reason (review).Philip Dwyer - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):402-403.
Is Kant’s transcendental deduction of the categories fit for purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
113 (#112,309)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2009-01-28
Downloads
113 (#112,309)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
