Is tenure justified? An experimental study of faculty beliefs about tenure, promotion, and academic freedom

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):553-569 (2006)
The behavioral sciences have come under attack for writings and speech that affront sensitivities. At such times, academic freedom and tenure are invoked to forestall efforts to censure and terminate jobs. We review the history and controversy surrounding academic freedom and tenure, and explore their meaning across different fields, at different institutions, and at different ranks. In a multifactoral experimental survey, 1,004 randomly selected faculty members from top-ranked institutions were asked how colleagues would typically respond when confronted with dilemmas concerning teaching, research, and wrong-doing. Full professors were perceived as being more likely to insist on having the academic freedom to teach unpopular courses, research controversial topics, and whistle-blow wrong-doing than were lower-ranked professors (even associate professors with tenure). Everyone thought that others were more likely to exercise academic freedom than they themselves were, and that promotion to full professor was a better predictor of who would exercise academic freedom than was the awarding of tenure. Few differences emerged related either to gender or type of institution, and behavioral scientists' beliefs were similar to scholars from other fields. In addition, no support was found for glib celebrations of tenure's sanctification of broadly defined academic freedoms. These findings challenge the assumption that tenure can be justified on the basis of fostering academic freedom, suggesting the need for a re-examination of the philosophical foundation and practical implications of tenure in today's academy. (Published Online February 8 2007) Key Words: academia; academic freedom; ethical issues; faculty beliefs; professoriate; promotion; scientific misconduct; tenure; whistle-blowing.
Keywords academia   academic freedom   ethical issues   faculty beliefs   professoriate   promotion   scientific misconduct   tenure   whistle-blowing
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X06009125
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,169
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Tenure is Justifiable.W. Bentley MacLeod - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):581-583.
Tenure is Fine, but Rank is Sublime.Douglas Peters - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):583-583.
The Untouchables: Benefits, Costs, and Risks of Tenure in Real Cases.Frank Farley - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):574-575.
Ethics, Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure.Richard T. De George - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):11-25.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
25 ( #208,219 of 2,191,918 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #288,547 of 2,191,918 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature