Christian Bioethics 14 (3):283-301 (2008)

Abstract
This article raises three challenges to Richard McCormick's proportionalism. First, adequately to judge proportionate reason requires the specification of a particular background moral content and metaphysical context. Absent such specification, evaluation of proportionate reason is inherently and deeply ambiguous. Second, to resolve such ambiguity and yet remain Christian, proportionalism must adopt a forthrightly Christian moral content set within a straightforwardly Christian metaphysics. This move will, however, set Christian bioethics off as sectarian—a conclusion McCormick wishes to avoid. Third, even if proportionalism were to adopt a Christian moral content and metaphysics to avoid such ambiguity, its methodology sets aside a key aspect of the Christian life: repentance. Proportionalism does not account for the core reality that repentance plays in one's personal encounter with and knowledge of God. As I will argue, the challenge in part is that moral action cannot be adequately conceptualized, nor can moral theology be properly understood, outside of the authentic practice of the religious life, and repentance is central to that Christian reality
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/cb/cbn017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,118
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair Macintyre - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):363-363.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Introduction.D. Christopher Ralston - 2008 - Christian Bioethics 14 (3):227-235.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ambiguity in Moral Choice.Richard McCormick - 2000 - In Christopher Robert Kaczor (ed.), Religious Studies. Marquette University Press. pp. 252-253.
Richard McCormick and Proportionate Reason.Sanford S. Levy - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):258 - 278.
Moral Epistemology in Richard McCormick's Ethics.J. B. Tubbs - 1996 - Christian Bioethics 2 (1):114-126.
How Can Theology Be Moral?Oliver O'Donovan - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):81 - 94.
In Defence of Ambiguity.Rex Gibson - 1979 - Journal of Moral Education 9 (1):17-22.
Theology and Christian Ethics.James M. Gustafson - 1974 - Philadelphia: United Church Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
43 ( #216,931 of 2,324,569 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #461,830 of 2,324,569 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes