Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):597-598 (2000)

James Chisholm
University of Western Australia
Gangestad & Simpson's model of the evolution of within-sex differences in reproductive strategies requires a degree of female choice that probably did not exist because of male coercion. We argue as well that the tradeoff between current and future reproduction accounts for more of the within-sex differences in reproductive strategies than the “good-genes-good parenting” tradeoff they propose.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00343370
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,797
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,147,758 of 2,425,657 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #546,862 of 2,425,657 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes