Nominalization and Montague grammar: A semantics without types for natural languages [Book Review]

Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (3):303 - 354 (1982)
Abstract
We started from the fact that type theory, in the way it was implemented in IL, makes it costly to deal with nominalization processes. We have also argued that the type hierarchy as such doesn't play any real role in a grammar; the classification it provides for different semantic objects is already contained, in some sense, in the categorial structure of the grammar itself. So, on the basis of a theory of properties (Cocchiarella's HST*) we have tried to build a language (IL*) whose syntax does not contain any explicit typing of expressions. Some of the consequences that this move brings about in the overall organization of the grammar can be summarized as follows:it allows for a simple treatment of infinitives, gerunds, factives and, in general, all those phenomena which might be analyzed as cases of nominalization;it provides a simpler and more constrained semantics than IL, since IL* doesn't go beyond second order, and its non-modal basis is axiomatizable;it suggests that the role of logical form in a theory of grammar could be that of a family of theories of semantic objects;it eliminates the extrinsic limitations of a type hierarchy on the choice of the system of syntactic categories.I think that it is interesting to notice how having an explicit semantic framework helps to provide a sense in which it is legitimate to regard the syntax of a language as ‘autonomous’
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00351458
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,248
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.Jon Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Formal Philosophy. [REVIEW]Richard Montague - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):573-578.
Logics and Languages.M. J. Cresswell - 1973 - London: Methuen [Distributed in the U.S.A. By Harper & Row.
Towards a Proper Treatment of Quantification in English.Richard Montague - 1974 - In Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy. Yale University Press.
A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation.Hans Kamp - 1981 - In P. Portner & B. H. Partee (eds.), Formal Semantics - the Essential Readings. Blackwell. pp. 189--222.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Semantics and Property Theory.Gennaro Chierchia & Raymond Turner - 1988 - Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (3):261 - 302.
Predication as Ascription.David Liebesman - 2015 - Mind 124 (494):517-569.
Resolving Questions, I.Jonathan Ginzburg - 1995 - Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (5):459 - 527.
Generic Terms and Generic Sentences.Greg N. Carlson - 1982 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (2):145 - 181.
Resolving Questions, II.Jonathan Ginzburg - 1995 - Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (6):567 - 609.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
90 ( #59,339 of 2,192,220 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #95,633 of 2,192,220 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature