The Aristotelian and Thomistic conception of magnanimity (magnanimitas) in the context of integral human development

Studia Gilsoniana 11 (1):119-143 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Aristotelian and Thomistic conception of magnanimity (magnanimitas) has grown on the grounds of the philosophical understanding of high culture in man. It was preceded by the appearance of such concepts as paidéia and kalokagathía. Having ethical excellence (kalokagathía) is an indispensable condition for self-worth and justified pride, called by Aristotle magnanimity. For Aristotle, magnanimity was a typical virtue of the group of valor, in which striving for the good connected with difficulties is significant. Greek culture in antiquity, whose ideals were focused on the term paidéia, had a significant impact on the thought and culture of early Christianity, which grew on Hellenistic grounds. We will see St. Thomas’ conception of magnanimity by analyzing his reflections on virtue as he listed it among the ingredients of the virtue of valor. Considerations of magnanimity can be combined with the explanation of what is high culture in man. The realistic concept of a person revealed that—because of transcendence—the ultimate goal, the end of human cognition and love is perfection. Such an understanding of holiness is synonymous with the highest development of the human person, meaning the state of man that is fully perfect. Man reaches the peak of his development potential, the highest level of culture, when he is united with God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Aristotelian Magnanimity against the Pride Objection with the Help of Aquinas.Lindsay K. Cleveland - 2014 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 88:259-271.
Some Developments in Aristotle's Conception of Magnanimity.Terence Irwin - 1999 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 11 (1):173-194.
Aquinas and the challenge of aristotelian magnanimity.Mary M. Keys - 2003 - History of Political Thought 24 (1):37-65.
What It Takes to be Great.David A. Horner - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (4):415-444.
Virtues. The Aristotelian-Thomistic Line of Thinking.Michael Wladika - 2019 - In Elisa Grimi, John Haldane, Maria Margarita Mauri Alvarez, Michael Wladika, Marco Damonte, Michael Slote, Randall Curren, Christian B. Miller, Liezl Zyl, Christopher D. Owens, Scott J. Roniger, Michele Mangini, Nancy Snow & Christopher Toner (eds.), Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect. Springer. pp. 27-42.
Prolegomena to a Thomistic child psychology.Eugene M. DeRobertis - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):151-164.
Persons, Souls, and Life After Death.Christopher Hauser - 2021 - In William Simpson, Robert C. Koons & James Orr (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics and the Theology of Nature. New York, NY, USA: pp. 245-266.
Imaginative virtue ethics: A transportation-transcendental approach.Surendra Arjoon & Meena Rambocas - 2021 - International Journal of Ethics Education 7 (1):35-51.
Darwinism, Magnanimity, and Modernity.Carson Holloway - 2005 - Interpretation 32 (1):77-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-27

Downloads
3 (#1,708,708)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Humanitas.[author unknown] - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 18 (1):96-97.
Kalokagathia.Piotr Jaroszyński - 1994 - Dialogue and Humanism 4 (5):79-87.

Add more references