- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the nature of theories: A neurocomputational perspective
Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14:59--101 (1989)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Paul M. Churchland, A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science Reviewed by.Jeffrey Foss - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10 (10):399-402.
Dealing in Futures Folk Psychology and the Role of Representations in Cognitive Science.Andy Clark - 1993 - University of Sussex.
The thesis of theory-Laden observation in the light of cognitive psychology.Anna Estany - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (2):203-217.
Dealing in futures: Folk psychology and the role of representations in cognitive science.Andy Clark - 1996 - In Robert N. McCauley (ed.), The Churchlands and their critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Brainwork: A review of Paul Churchland's a neurocomputational perspective. [REVIEW]Robert N. McCauley - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):81 – 96.
Philosophical and religious implications of cognitive social learning theories of personality.William A. Rottschaefer - 1991 - Zygon 26 (1):137-148.
Epistemology radically naturalized-recovering the normative, the experimental, and the social.Steve Fuller - 1992 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15:427-459.
Cognitive psychology and principled skepticism.Barbara von Eckardt - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (February):67-88.
Implications of the Cognitive Sciences for the Philosophy of Science.Ronald N. Giere - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:419 - 430.
A deeper unity-some Feyerabendian themes in neurocomputational form.Paul M. Churchland - 1992 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15:341-363.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
120 (#41,445)
6 months
16 (#899,032)
2009-01-28
Downloads
120 (#41,445)
6 months
16 (#899,032)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Who’s Afraid of Nagelian Reduction?Foad Dizadji-Bahmani, Roman Frigg & Stephan Hartmann - 2010 - Erkenntnis 73 (3):393-412.
Mental Representation and Closely Conflated Topics.Angela Mendelovici - 2010 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Content and cluster analysis: Assessing representational similarity in neural systems.Aarre Laakso & Garrison Cottrell - 2000 - Philosophical Psychology 13 (1):47-76.
Understanding the Progress of Science.C. D. McCoy - 2022 - In Insa Lawler, Kareem Khalifa & Elay Shech (eds.), Scientific Understanding and Representation: Modeling in the Physical Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 353-369.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo