- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Sham Surgery: To Cut or Not to Cut—That Is the Ethical Dilemma
American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):66-68 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Response to Commentators on "Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis".Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):36-36.
Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):41-48.
Sham Surgery in Research: A Surgeon's View.Peter Angelos - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):65-66.
The Physician's Role, "Sham Surgery," and Trust: A Conflict of Duties?Chalmers C. Clark - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):57-58.
Sham Surgery and Genuine Standards of Care: Can the Two be Reconciled?Alex John London & Joseph B. Kadane - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):61-64.
Sham surgery: Not an oxymoron.Charles J. Kowalski - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):8 – 9.
Sham surgery: An ethical analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):157-166.
The ethics of sham surgery in Parkinson's disease: Back to the future?Teresa Swift & Richard Huxtable - 2011 - Bioethics 27 (4):175-185.
The Sham Surgery Debate and the Moral Complexity of Risk-Benefit Analysis.Scott Y. H. Kim - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):68-70.
Sham surgery in randomized trials: Additional requirements should be satisfied.Howard Mann - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):5 – 7.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-11
Downloads
20 (#792,731)
6 months
9 (#355,272)
2010-09-11
Downloads
20 (#792,731)
6 months
9 (#355,272)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Surgical Research, an Elusive Entity.Angelique M. Reitsma & Jonathan D. Moreno - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):49-50.
Does Placebo Surgery-Controlled Research Call for New Provisions to Protect Human Research Participants?Dorothy E. Vawter, Karen G. Gervais & Thomas B. Freeman - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):50-53.
A Response to Commentators on "Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis".Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):36-36.
‘Sham Surgery’ Control Groups: Ethics and Context.Teresa Swift - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (4):148-155.
References found in this work
Sham surgery: An ethical analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):157-166.
Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):41-48.
Thinking Clearly about Research Risk: Implications of the Work of Benjamin Freedman.Charles Weijer - 1999 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 21 (6):1.
Placebo Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?Peter A. Clark - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):58-68.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kfj6z uwo