The dual nature of the language faculty

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1046-1055 (1999)
Abstract
The following discussion aims to illuminate further the way in which morphologically complex words are represented in the mental lexicon. It is argued that the dual-mechanism model can accommodate the linguistic and psycholinguistic evidence currently available, not only on German inflection (as pointed out in the target article) but also on other languages (as presented in several commentaries). Associative single-mechanism models of inflection, on the other hand, provide only partial accounts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99562225
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,751
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Lexical Storage and Regular Processes.Geert Booij - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1016-1016.
What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language?Barry C. Smith - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75.
On the Cross-Linguistic Validity of a Dual-Mechanism Model.Margherita Orsolini - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1033-1035.
Diachronic Evidence for a Dual-Mechanism Approach to Inflection.David Fertig - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1023-1024.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

12 ( #363,008 of 2,146,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #162,529 of 2,146,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums