What is the significance of cross-national variability in sociosexuality?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):280-280 (2005)
Abstract
Schmitt finds that national sex ratios predict levels of sociosexuality, but how we should interpret this result is unclear for both methodological and conceptual reasons. We criticize aspects of Schmitt's theorizing and his analytic strategy, and suggest that some additional analyses of the data in hand might be illuminating.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X0527005X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,829
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sociosexual Strategies in Tribes and Nations.Stephen Beckerman - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):277-278.
On Sociosexual Cognitive Architecture.Thomas E. Dickins - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):280-281.
Sociosexuality and Sex Ratio: Sex Differences and Local Markets.John Lazarus - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):288-288.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

7 ( #528,924 of 2,178,178 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #54,693 of 2,178,178 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums