Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (1):55-79 (2018)

When people communicate, they coordinate a wide range of linguistic and non-linguistic behaviors. This process of coordination is called alignment, and it is assumed to be fundamental to successful communication. In this paper, we question this assumption and investigate whether disalignment is a more successful strategy in some cases. More specifically, we hypothesize that alignment correlates with task success only when communication is interactive. We present results from a spot-the-difference task in which dyads of interlocutors have to decide whether they are viewing the same scene or not. Interactivity was manipulated in three conditions by increasing the amount of information shared between interlocutors. We use recurrence quantification analysis to measure the alignment between the scan-patterns of the interlocutors. We found that interlocutors who could not exchange feedback aligned their gaze more, and that increased gaze alignment correlated with decreased task success in this case. When feedback was possible, in contrast, interlocutors utilized it to better organize their joint search strategy by diversifying visual attention. This is evidenced by reduced overall alignment in the minimal feedback and full dialogue conditions. However, only the dyads engaged in a full dialogue increased their gaze alignment over time to achieve successful performances. These results suggest that alignment per se does not imply communicative success, as most models of dialogue assume. Rather, the effect of alignment depends on the type of alignment, on the goals of the task, and on the presence of feedback.
Keywords Alignment  Dialogue task  Eye‐tracking  Interactivity  Task success
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/tops.12300
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Full Alignment of Some but Not All Representations in Dialogue.Holly P. Branigan - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):191-192.
Grammars with Parsing Dynamics: A New Perspective on Alignment.Ruth Kempson - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):202-203.
Beyond Linguistic Alignment.Allan Mazur - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):205-206.
Dialogue in the Degenerate Case?Patrick G. T. Healey - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-201.
Interactive Alignment: Priming or Memory Retrieval?Michael Kaschak & Arthur Glenberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-202.


Added to PP index

Total views
33 ( #343,143 of 2,498,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,910 of 2,498,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes