How analysis and synthesis have been understood in design

Abstract

In the disciplines related to the design of products and services, such as New Product Development and Design Science, there is a lack of a commonly accepted theoretical and methodical basis. This papers starts with the proposition that the ancient method of analysis and synthesis, developed originally by Greek geometers, is the basis of models that have been used to classify and describe the ill structured design problem. In this paper, we examine the possibility of improving our understanding of the design process and therefore lean design management by bringing to light a discussion about the concepts of analysis and synthesis and how these have been interpreted through time. Also, how this concept has been used within engineering design methods. To do so, we investigate how analysis and synthesis have been understood in the literature, indicating similarities and differences between ancient and current understandings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Design science 97.Jürgen Friedrich - 1996 - AI and Society 10 (2):199-217.
Toward an horizon in design ethics.Philippe D’Anjou - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):355-370.
Is informatics a design discipline?Peter Purgathofer - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (4):303-314.
When reduction leads to construction: Design considerations in scientific methodology.Jeffry L. Ramsey - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):241 – 253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-10

Downloads
204 (#62,883)

6 months
1 (#449,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Method of Analysis.J. Hintikka & U. Remes - 1977 - Mind 86 (341):133-136.

Add more references