Media Bias and the Persistence of the Expectation Gap: An Analysis of Press Articles on Corporate Fraud

Journal of Business Ethics 144 (3):637-659 (2017)

Abstract
Prior research has documented the continued existence of an expectation gap, defined as the divergence between the public’s and the profession’s conceptions of auditor’s duties, despite the auditing profession’s attempt to adopt standards and practices to close this gap. In this paper, we consider one potential explanation for the persistence of the expectation gap: the role of media bias in shaping public opinion and views. We analyze press articles covering 40 U.S. corporate fraud cases discovered between 1992 and 2011. We compare the auditor’s duties, described by the auditing standards, with the description of the fraud cases as found in the press articles. We draw upon prior research to identify three sources of the expectation gap: deficient performance, deficient standards, and unreasonable expectations. The results of our analysis provide evidence that the performance gap can be reduced by strengthening auditor’s willingness and ability to apply existing auditing standards concerning fraud detection; the standards gap can be narrowed by improving existing auditing standards; and unreasonable expectations, however, involve elements beyond the profession’s sphere of control. As a result, the expectation gap is unlikely to disappear given the media’s tendency to bias, with an overemphasis of unreasonable expectations in their coverage of frauds and press articles tending to reinforce the view that the auditor should take more responsibility for detecting fraud, irrespective of whether this is feasible at a reasonable cost. In addition to the primary role of the press in perpetuating the expectation gap, a second reason for continuation of the expectation gap is that the rational auditor will have difficulty in assessing subjective components of fraudulent behavior.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2851-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,413
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification.Michael Power - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (1):92-94.
Public Opinion.Charles E. Merriam - 1946 - Philosophical Review 55:497.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defining and Understanding Fraud.G. J. Rossouw - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (4):885-895.
Internal Corporate Governance and Personal Trust.Deon Rossouw - 2009 - African Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):37.
Interpretation of Tests of Heterogeneity and Bias in Meta‐Analysis.John P. A. Ioannidis - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):951-957.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
21 ( #450,269 of 2,291,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #181,185 of 2,291,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature