Was Wittgenstein a plagiarist?

Philosophy 76 (3):451-459 (2001)
Abstract
Laurence Goldstein has ‘re-created’ Wittgenstein's doctoral viva, arguing that had Wittgenstein's dissertation, his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, ‘been judged by normal standards of originality and philosophical argumentation, it would have failed’. Goldstein claims that Wittgenstein ‘lifted’ central doctrines from Russell and from Bernard Bolzano. I point out that passages allegedly plagiarized from Russell are actually criticisms of his doctrines, and that there is no evidence that Wittgenstein even knew Bolzano's work, directly or indirectly. I argue that alleged similarities, substantial and stylistic, between his work and Bolzano's give no support even to a weaker claim of influence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819101000390
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,830
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Philosophical Plagiarism.Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Theoria 74 (2):97-101.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
21 ( #296,940 of 2,293,667 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #410,256 of 2,293,667 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature