A Christian for the Christians, a Christian for the Muslims! An Attempt at an Argumentum ad Hominem

Christian Bioethics 4 (3):284-304 (1998)
Abstract
Schmidt and Egler's critique of Christianity's exclusivist claim to truth rests on two suppositions: (a) that inter-religious pastoral care for dying patients requires a respect for their cultural backgrounds which necessitates accepting the equal validity of their respective (non-Christian) religions, and (b) that exclusivism is incompatible with the Christian love-of-neighbor commandment. In opposition to this critique, (a) the authors' own “pluralist” understanding of Christianity is refuted on two levels. First, it leads to inconsistencies in the authors' own (and very adequate) understanding of pastoral care, especially with regard to their notion of intolerance, and second, it is irreconcilable with explicit New and Old Testament claims to absoluteness. In addition, (b) the authors' understanding of the way in which “exclusivism” justifies intolerance and missionary violence is shown to rest, first, on a secularized reduction of Christianity, i.e., of Christians' own “religious identity” as well as of the Christian way of “helping those in need,” and second, on a merely theoretical (rather than also practical) view of Christians' commitment to God. As a corollary to that refutation, a reconsideration of the truly Christian sources of obedience and charity is recommended
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/chbi.4.3.284.6899
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,719
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Why Christians Should Not Be Determinists.Thomas Talbott - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):300-316.
Christian Moral Education.John Hill - 1981 - Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (1):103 - 117.
The Singularity of Christian Ethics.Gilbert Meilaender - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):95-120.
Introduction to 'Philosophy and Argumentum Ad Hominem'.Douglas Walton - 1993 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (3-4):24-24.
Law, Liberty, and Christian Morality.Kyle Swan - 2007 - Religious Studies 43 (4):395-415.
Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total downloads
28 ( #189,295 of 2,197,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,047 of 2,197,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature