Getting real about invariants

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):219-220 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Stoffregen & Bardy argue that unimodal invariants do not exist, and that only invariants are possible. But they confuse two separate issues. Amodal invariants, we argue, do indeed exist to specify features of the environment, but not even an amodal invariant, in isolation, could specify their or

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Zizek: a critical introduction.Sarah Kay - 2003 - Malden, MA: Distributed in the USA by Blackwell.
Adding one random real.Tomek Bartoszyński, Andrzej Rosłanowski & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):80-90.
Hechler reals.Grzegorz Łabędzki & Miroslav Repický - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):444-458.
Seeing, acting, and knowing.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):999-999.
Invariants and cues.James E. Cutting - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):102-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#344,113)

6 months
10 (#262,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references