Why isn't Stich an eliminativist?

In Dominic Murphy & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 14--74 (2009)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,749
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Making Sense of Ourselves.Daniel C. Dennett - 1981 - Philosophical Topics 12 (1):63-81.
Replies.Stephen Stich - 2009 - In Dominic Murphy & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Wiley-Blackwell.
The Case Against Stich's Syntactic Theory of Mind.Kevin Possin - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (May):405-18.
Connectionist Minds.Andy Clark - 1989 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 90:83-102.
Can We Turn a Blind Eye to Eliminativism?Francisco Calvo Garzón - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (4):485-498.
On Determining What There Isn't.Michael Devitt - 2009 - In Dominic Murphy & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Blackwell.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
13 ( #365,700 of 2,197,346 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,877 of 2,197,346 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature