- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Book Review: Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and Habermas [Book Review]
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):152-154 (2012)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Book Review: Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and HabermasRehgWilliamCogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and HabermasCambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009. 360 pp. $40. [REVIEW]K. Brad Wray - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):152-154.
Treating Kuhn’s Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg . Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. [REVIEW]Frank Zenker - unknown
Review essay: William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and Habermas.John H. Zammito - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):359-365.
K. Brad Wray: Interpreting Kuhn: Critical Essays. [REVIEW]Howard Sankey - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):311-314.
K. Brad Wray: Resisting Scientific Realism, Book Review. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2018. [REVIEW]Ragnar van der Merwe - 2020 - Journal for the General Philosophy of Science 51 (4):637-641.
Resisting Scientific Realism by K. Brad Wray. [REVIEW]Samuel Ruhmkorff - 2019 - British Journal for Philosophy of Science Review of Books 1.
Habermas meets science: William Rehg: Cogent science in context: The science wars, argumentation theory, and Habermas. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009, 360pp, $40.00, £29.95 HB. [REVIEW]Stephen Turner - 2011 - Metascience 21 (2):419-423.
K. Brad Wray, Kuhn's Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Francis Remedios - 2012 - Philosophy in Review 32 (6):533-535.
Kuhnovské paradigma pro současnou filosofii vědy. [REVIEW]Libor Benda - 2013 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 35 (3):470-477.
K. Brad Wray, ed., Knowledge and Inquiry Reviewed by.Mark Owen Webb - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23 (4):303-305.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-21
Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)
6 months
3 (#1,046,015)
2020-11-21
Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)
6 months
3 (#1,046,015)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Theory change as dimensional change: conceptual spaces applied to the dynamics of empirical theories.Peter Gärdenfors & Frank Zenker - 2013 - Synthese 190 (6):1039-1058.
Modeling Diachronic Changes in Structuralism and in Conceptual Spaces.Frank Zenker & Peter Gärdenfors - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S8):1-15.
Communication, Rationality, and Conceptual Changes in Scientific Theories.Peter Gärdenfors & Frank Zenker - 2015 - In Peter Gärdenfors & Frank Zenker (eds.), Applications of Conceptual Spaces : the Case for Geometric Knowledge Representation. Cham: Springer Verlag.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-dxklk uwo