The ethics of embryonic stem cell research

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):533 – 562 (2004)
Howard Curzer
Texas Tech University
In this article I rebut conservative objections to five phases of embryonic stem cell research. I argue that researchers using existing embryonic stem cell lines are not complicit in the past destruction of embryos because beneficiaries of immoral acts are not necessary morally tainted. Second, such researchers do not encourage the destruction of additional embryos because fertility clinics presently destroy more spare embryos than researchers need. Third, actually harvesting stem cells from slated-to-be-discarded embryos is not wrong. The embryos are not sacrificed for the good of others because they would have been destroyed anyway. Fourth, harvesting stem cells from embryos that are not doomed is morally acceptable, because preserving frozen embryos is futile therapy. Finally, creating embryos solely for the sake of harvesting stem cells from them is morally acceptable because the assumption that embryos have the right to life has very counterintuitive implications.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03605310490514225
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,445
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Embryonic Stem Cells and Property Rights.A. -K. M. Andersson - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):221-242.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
408 ( #8,756 of 2,285,006 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #231,437 of 2,285,006 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature