Sovereignty as Trusteeship and Indigenous Peoples

Theoretical Inquiries in Law 16 (2):507-534 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We explore two special challenges indigenous peoples pose to the idea of sovereigns as trustees for humanity. The first challenge is rooted in a colonial history during which a trusteeship model of sovereignty served as an enabler of paternalistic colonial policies. The challenge is to show that the trusteeship model is not irreparably colonial in nature. The second challenge, which emerges from the first, is to specify the scope and nature of indigenous peoples’ sovereignty within the trusteeship model. Whereas the interaction between states and foreign nationals is the locus of cosmopolitan law, the relationship between states and indigenous peoples is distinctive. In the ordinary cosmopolitan case, foreign nationals do not purport to possess legal authority. Indigenous peoples often do make such a claim, pitting their claim to authority against the state’s. We discuss how international law has attempted to come to grips with indigenous sovereignty by requiring states to include indigenous peoples in decision-making processes that affect their historical lands and rights. A crucial fault line in the jurisprudence, however, separates a duty to consult indigenous peoples from a duty to acquire their free, prior and informed consent. The latter but not the former recognizes that indigenous peoples possess a veto over state projects on their lands, in effect recognizing in them a limited co-legislative power. We focus on recent jurisprudence from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and consider whether either the duty to consult or FPIC are enough to dispel the shadow of the trusteeship model’s colonial past. We suggest that they are a move in the right direction, and that implicitly they represent international law’s recognition that states are no longer the sole bearers of sovereignty at international law. In limited circumstances, international law recognizes indigenous peoples as sovereign actors.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,140

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Colonialism of Incarceration.Robert Nichols - 2014 - Radical Philosophy Review 17 (2):435-455.
Indigeneity, Self-Determination, and Sovereignty.Anne Schulherr Waters - 2002 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on American Indians in Philosophy.
Syllabus: Native Studies 450-001: Global Indigenous Philosophy, Spring 2005, University of New Mexico.Anne Schulherr Waters - 2005 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on American Indians in Philosophy.
Narratives of Race and Indigeneity in the Genographic Project.Kim TallBear - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):412-424.


Added to PP

14 (#732,437)

6 months
1 (#447,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Evan Fox-Decent
McGill University

Citations of this work

R2H and the Prospects For Peace: An Essay on Sovereign Responsibilities.David Luban - forthcoming - Archiv für Rechts-Und Sozialphilosophie.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references