Télos 2014 (169):155-161 (2014)

Authors
David Danks
Carnegie Mellon University
Abstract
Debates about the moral permissibility of mass electronic surveillance often turn on whether consequentialist considerations legitimately trump relevant deontological rights and principles. In order to establish such overriding consequences, many proponents of mass surveillance employ a modern analogue of Pascal’s wager: they contend that the consequences of no surveillance are so severe that any probability of such outcomes legitimates the abrogation of the relevant rights. In this paper, I briefly review Pascal’s original wager about whether to live a pious life, including two classes of objections that were almost immediately leveled against his argument. I then show that analogues of those objections apply straightforwardly to the modern versions of Pascal’s wager. Mass electronic surveillance might be ethically permissible or even obligatory in some circumstances, but the details matter in ways that are systematically ignored or assumed away in a Pascal’s wager-type argument. Careful consideration of the complexities of our modern situation is required to decide whether consequentialist considerations override deontological principles in this domain
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3817/1214169155
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,873
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Relative Moral Risks of Untargeted and Targeted Surveillance.Katerina Hadjimatheou - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (2):187-207.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pascal's Wager.Alan Hájek - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.Graham Oppy - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (3):159 - 168.
Pascal’s and Tabarrok’s Wagers.Lars Peter Østerdal - 2004 - Theory and Decision 57 (1):1-4.
Pascal's Wager is a Possible Bet (but Not a Very Good One): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.Graham Oppy - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):101 - 116.
Infinite Return: Two Ways of Wagering with Pascal.James Wetzel - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (2):139 - 149.
Waging War on Pascal’s Wager.Alan Hájek - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (1):27-56.
Infinite Return: Two Ways of Wagering with Pascal.James Wetzel - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (2):139-149.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-01

Total views
44 ( #226,471 of 2,401,778 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #198,131 of 2,401,778 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes