Rationality, coherence, convergence: A critical comment on Michael Smith's ethics and the a priori

Philosophical Books 48 (2):99-108 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
128 (#33,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

How is Moral Disagreement a Problem for Realism?David Enoch - 2009 - The Journal of Ethics 13 (1):15-50.
Is reflective equilibrium enough?Thomas Kelly & Sarah McGrath - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):325-359.
A Puzzle About Reasons and Rationality.Caj Strandberg - 2017 - The Journal of Ethics 21 (1):63-88.
Neo‐Humean rationality and two types of principles.Caj Strandberg - 2024 - Analytic Philosophy 65 (2):256-273.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Explaining action.Kieran Setiya - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (3):339-393.
The metaethical problem.Geoffrey Sayre-McCord - 1997 - Ethics 108 (1):55-83.
Do the desires of rational agents converge?David Sobel - 1999 - Analysis 59 (3):137–147.

Add more references