The status of constructivism in chemical education research and its relationship to the teaching and learning of the concept of idealization in chemistry
Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2):153-176 (2006)
A review of the chemical education research literature suggests that the term constructivism is used in two ways: experience-based constructivism and discipline-based constructivism. These two perspectives are examined as an epistemology in relation to the teaching and learning of the concept of idealization in chemistry. It is claimed that experience-based constructivism is powerless to inform the origin of such concepts in chemistry and while discipline-based constructivism can admit such theoretical concepts as idealization it does not offer any unique perspectives that cannot be obtained from other models. Chemical education researchers do not consistently appeal to constructivism as an epistemology or as a teaching/learning perspective and it is shown that, while it draws attention to worthwhile teaching/learning strategies, it cannot be considered as foundational to chemical education research and tends to be used more as an educational label than as an undergirding theory.
|Keywords||experience-based constructivism discipline-based constructivism idealization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach.Ronald N. Giere - 1988 - Philosophical Review 100 (4):653-656.
Constructivism in Science and Science Education: A Philosophical Critique.Robert Nola - 1997 - Science and Education 6 (1-2):55-83.
Learning Science: Some Insights From Cognitive Science.P. S. C. Matthews - 2000 - Science and Education 9 (6):507-535.
Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education.Michael R. Matthews - 1997 - Science and Education 6 (1-2):5-14.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Physics Develops Unaffected by Constructivism.Helmut Schwegler - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253.
Radical Constructivism and Its Failings: Anti-Realism and Individualism.Mark Olssen - 1996 - British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):275-295.
Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning.Ernst von Glasersfeld - 1995 - Falmer Press.
Constructivism's New Clothes: The Trivial, the Contingent, and a Progressive Research Programme Into the Learning of Science. [REVIEW]Keith S. Taber - 2006 - Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2):189-219.
Breaking the Law: Promoting Domain-Specificity in Chemical Education in the Context of Arguing About the Periodic Law. [REVIEW]Sibel Erduran - 2007 - Foundations of Chemistry 9 (3):247-263.
The Semantics of Chemical Education: Constructivism, Externalism and the Language of Chemistry. [REVIEW]Pedro J. Sánchez Gómez - 2013 - Foundations of Chemistry 15 (1):103-116.
Reconstructing Undergraduate Education: Using Learning Science to Design Effective Courses.Robert B. Innes - 2004 - L. Erlbaum Associates.
Connections Between Pedagogical and Epistemological Constructivism: Questions for Teaching and Research in Chemistry. [REVIEW]Donald J. Wink - 2006 - Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2):111-151.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #126,421 of 2,154,162 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #397,229 of 2,154,162 )
How can I increase my downloads?