The collapse of insensitive semantics

Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (2):117-140 (2010)

The idea motivating their account, Cappelen and Lepore (C&L) say in Insensitive Semantics (2005), is that semantic content is context invariant, and that all colleagues who take, or even consider, different accounts are just on the wrong track. It is the purpose of their book to disprove all alternative accounts by way of an argument ‘by elimination’. The conclusion they arrive at is that their own account must be accepted by everyone as the only game in town at the end of the day . The present paper is intended to examine this conclusion; its more significant findings are these. Firstly, C&L’s account is not, as they suggest, strictly minimalist, but in fact just a moderate version of contextualism. Secondly, prematurely associating semantical incompleteness and context sensitivity, they overlook some possible alternatives to their own view, among them at least one that is attractive. Thirdly, their argument ‘by elimination’ has an inductive structure, but is inexhaustive, and therefore inconclusive. Fourthly, for several different reasons, their attempts to reject arguments in favour of semantical incompleteness do not work. Finally, their contention that arguments in favour of semantical incompleteness employ metaphysical premisses for semantical conclusions rests on a faulty interpretation of these arguments. In the light of these findings, it is concluded that the central argument of Insensitive Semantics fails
Keywords Context sensitivity  Insensitive Semantics  Semantic content  Semantical incompleteness  Truth conditions
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10988-010-9077-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,966
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Relevance.D. Sperber & D. Wilson - 1995 - Blackwell.
Conversational Impliciture.Kent Bach - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (2):124-162.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Minimizing Indexicality.Wayne A. Davis - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):1-20.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Précis of Insensitive Semantics. [REVIEW]Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):425–434.
Insensitive Semantics.Charles Travis - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (1):39–49.
The Excluded Middle: Semantic Minimalism Without Minimal Propositions. [REVIEW]Kent Bach - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):435–442.


Added to PP index

Total views
85 ( #87,767 of 2,235,936 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #458,180 of 2,235,936 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature