Ii. a reply to Siegel on Kuhnian relativism

Abstract
Siegel argues that the Kuhnian relativism presented in ?Kuhn's Epistemological Relativism? fails because it neglects the possibility of rational choice in science between rival paradigms? own incommensurable standards on the basis of ?paradigm?neutral external standards?. In reply, it is argued (1) that Siegel has given no reason to believe that there are such external standards in science, (2) that the mere ?possibility? of such standards in scientific debate is not sufficient to vitiate Kuhn's relativism, (3) that the actual existence of rational debate concerning the internal standards of rival paradigms does not entail (as Siegel claims) the existence of ?paradigm?neutral external standards?, and finally (4) that Kuhn's relativism concerning standards in science does not lead (as Siegel claims) to a ?reductio? which undermines the philosophical standards implicit in Kuhn's argument
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201748008601894
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Kuhn's Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense.Gerald Doppelt - 1978 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):33 – 86.
Epistemological Relativism in its Latest Form.Harvey Siegel - 1980 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):107 – 117.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Knowledge Attributions and Relevant Epistemic Standards.Dan Zeman - 2010 - In Recanati François, Stojanovic Isidora & Villanueva Neftali (eds.), Context Dependence, Perpsective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter.
Conceptual Development and Relativism: Reply to Siegel.van Haaften Wouter - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 27 (1):87-100.
Siegel on the Rationality of Science.Brian S. Baigrie - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (3):435-441.
Internal Realism, Truth and Understanding.Gordon Steinhoff - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:352 - 363.
Relativism, Standards and Aesthetic Judgements.James O. Young - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):221 – 231.
Epistemological Relativism in its Latest Form.Harvey Siegel - 1980 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):107 – 117.
Kuhn's Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense.Gerald Doppelt - 1978 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):33 – 86.
Added to PP index
2009-01-30

Total downloads
13 ( #359,469 of 2,180,114 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #304,925 of 2,180,114 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums