Lotteries, Knowledge, and Rational Belief
Igor Douven (ed.)
Cambridge University Press (forthcoming)
| Authors |
Igor Douven
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
|
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
Chapters BETA
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Three Puzzles About Lotteries.Julia Staffel - forthcoming - In Igor Douven (ed.), Lotteries, Knowledge, and Rational Belief. Cambridge University Press.
Douven, I. Ed. Lotteries, Knowledge and Rational Belief: Essays on the Lottery Paradox (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Martin Smith - forthcoming
Hawthorne's Lottery Puzzle and the Nature of Belief.Christopher S. Hill & Joshua Schechter - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):120-122.
Doing the Best One Can: A New Justification for the Use of Lotteries.Ittay Nissan-Rozen - 2012 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 5 (1):45-72.
Four Arguments for Denying That Lottery Beliefs Are Justified.Martin Smith - forthcoming - In Douven, I. ed. Lotteries, Knowledge and Rational Belief: Essays on the Lottery Paradox (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Cambridge:
Philosophy of Probability: Foundations, Epistemology, and Computation.Sylvia Wenmackers - 2011 - Dissertation, University of Groningen
Beliefs, Buses and Lotteries: Why Rational Belief Can’T Be Stably High Credence.Julia Staffel - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (7):1721-1734.
The Decision-Theoretic Lockean Thesis.Dustin Troy Locke - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):28-54.
Working Without a Net: A Study of Egocentric Epistemology.Richard Foley - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Two Conceptions of Knowledge: Rational Vs. Reliable Belief.Fred Dretske - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40 (1):15-30.
Belief-In Revisited: A Reply To Williams: J. J. MACINTOSH.J. J. Macintosh - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (4):487-503.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-05-31
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
2018-05-31
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
