Ethics and World Pictures in Kamm on Enhancement

American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):19-20 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Frances Kamm's characteristically subtle paper in response to Michael Sandel is an intriguing intervention in the long-standing and increasingly frustrating debate over the morality of enhancement...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265160591002674

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Ethics and world pictures in Kamm on enhancement.Richard E. Ashcroft & Karen P. Gui - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):19 – 20.
What Is And Is Not Wrong With Enhancement?Frances Kamm - 2010 - In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press.
with Enhancement?Frances Kamm - 2009 - In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press. pp. 91.
In search of the deep structure of morality: an interview with Frances Kamm.Alex Voorhoeve & Frances Kamm - 2006 - Imprints 9 (2):93-117.
Is there a problem with enhancement?Frances M. Kamm - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):5 – 14.
Ethics for Enemies: Terror, Torture, and War, by F. M. Kamm * The Moral Target: Aiming at Right Conduct in War and Other Conflicts, by F. M. Kamm. [REVIEW]A. Hosein - 2015 - Mind 124 (494):639-646.
Enhancement.Thomas Murray - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Intricate ethics: rights, responsibilities, and permissible harm.Frances Kamm - 2007 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
Enhancement in Sport, and Enhancement outside Sport.Thomas Douglas - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
An Argument against Arguments for Enhancement. [REVIEW]Michael J. Selgelid - 2008 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings.Julian Savulescu - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 516--535.
Response to Commentators on “What's Wrong With Enhancement?”.Frances Kamm - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):W4-W9.
Human Enhancement and Communication: On Meaning and Shared Understanding.Laura Cabrera & John Weckert - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1039-1056.
Kamm on the Morality of Killing:Morality, Mortality, Vol. 2, Rights, Duties, and Status. Frances M. Kamm.Michael Otsuka - 1997 - Ethics 108 (1):197-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
3 (#1,705,473)

6 months
1 (#1,472,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Future of Human Nature.Jurgen Habermas - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (309):483-486.
Is there a problem with enhancement?Frances M. Kamm - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):5 – 14.
Moral Generalities Revisited.Margaret Olivia Little - 2000 - In Brad Hooker & Margaret Olivia Little (eds.), Moral Particularism. Clarendon Press.
Morality, Mortality, Vol. 1: Death and Whom to Save from It.Frances Kamm - 1998 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 58 (4):963-967.
The Worth of a Child.Sidney Callahan & Thomas H. Murray - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (3):44.

View all 6 references / Add more references