Albany Law Review 67:167-209 (2003)
Notions of procedural justice alone are sufficient to support evidentiary exclusions in a wide variety of legal and law-like institutions that focus on conflict resolution, including courts. Special attention is paid to the relevance and need for exclusion of parties’ own assessments of the value of their claims.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Beyond Legitimacy. Can Proceduralism Say Anything Relevant About Justice?Emanuela Ceva - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):183-200.
Similar books and articles
Examining the Construct of Organizational Justice: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Relations with Work Attitudes and Behaviors. [REVIEW]Chockalingam Viswesvaran & Deniz S. Ones - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (3):193 - 203.
On Rawls’s Distinction Between Perfect and Imperfect Procedural Justice.Martin Gustafsson - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2):300-305.
Just Interactions in Value Conflicts: The Adversary Argumentation Principle.E. Ceva - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):149-170.
Impure Procedural Justice and the Management of Conflicts About Values.Emanuela Ceva - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):5-22.
Plural Values and Heterogeneous Situations. Considerations on the Scope for a Political Theory of Justice.Emanuela Ceva - 2007 - European Journal of Political Theory 6 (3):359-375.
Procedural and Distributive Justice: Examining Equity in a University Setting. [REVIEW]Sandra J. Hartman, Augusta C. Yrle & William P. Galle - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 20 (4):337 - 351.
The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice.András Miklós - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (2):161-182.
Added to index2009-04-24
Total downloads130 ( #35,625 of 2,153,858 )
Recent downloads (6 months)44 ( #6,185 of 2,153,858 )
How can I increase my downloads?