Bloomsbury Publishing (2021)

Authors
Abstract
Charles E. Snyder considers the New Academy's attacks on Stoic epistemology through a critical re-assessment of the 3rd century philosopher, Arcesilaus of Pitane. Arguing that the standard epistemological framework used to study the ancient Academy ignores the metaphysical dimensions at stake in Arcesilaus's critique, Snyder explores new territory for the historiography of Stoic-Academic debates in the early Hellenistic period. Focusing on the dispute between the Old and New Academy, reveals the metaphysical dimensions of Arcesilaus' arguments as essential to grasping what is innovative about the so-called New Academy. Resisting the partiality for epistemology in the historical reconstructions of ancient philosophy, this book defends a new philosophical framework that re-positions Arcesilaus' attack on the early Stoa as key to his deviation from the metaphysical foundations of both Stoic and Academic virtue ethics. Drawing on a wide range of scholarship on Hellenistic philosophy in French, Italian, and German, Beyond Hellenistic Epistemology builds bridges between analytical and continental approaches to the historiography of ancient philosophy, and makes an important and disruptive contribution to the literature.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $112.79 used   $129.97 new   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9781350202375   1350202371
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Arcesilaus and the Ontology of Stoic Cognition.Charles E. Snyder - 2020 - Review of Metaphysics 73 (March):455-493.
Foucault and the Historiography of Early Hellenistic Philosophy.Charles E. Snyder - 2021 - Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory.
Arcesilaus: Socratic Skepticism in Plato's Academy.Harald Thorsrud - 2018 - Lexicon Philosophicum: Hellenistic Theories of Knowledge.
Stoic Logic and Alexandrian Poetics.Claude Imbert - 1980 - In Malcolm Schofield, Myles Burnyeat & Jonathan Barnes (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 182--216.
Logic: The Stoics (Part Two).Susanne Bobzien - 1999 - In Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Review of Rene Brouwer, The Stoic Sage, Cambridge, 2014. [REVIEW]Vanessa de Harven - forthcoming - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 100 (2).
Stertinian Rhetoric: Pre-Imperial Stoic Theory and Practice of Public Discourse.Jula Wildberger - 2013 - In Kathryn Tempest & Christos Kremmydas (eds.), Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 249-276.
3 Arcesilaus and Carneades.I. Arcesilaus - 2010 - In Richard Arnot Home Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 58.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-26

Total views
2 ( #1,422,317 of 2,462,098 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,852 of 2,462,098 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes