Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (1):52-55 (2017)

Authors
Saskia E. Verkiel
Georgia State University
Abstract
Moral enhancement can be an attractive proposal, but contrary to cognitive enhancement, it is hard to define what kind of intervention would constitute moral enhancement. In an ongoing debate about the subject, Douglas argued that biomedically decreasing countermoral emotions would do so and would be morally permissible in particular cases. Harris disagreed, and one of his arguments is that failing to address the intellectual aspects of moral decisions—and simply targeting countermoral emotions—would effectively undermine our freedom by reducing our options to act immorally. In a consequent paper, Douglas defended his position. In this paper, I examine Douglas' response to Harris concern about the loss of freedom with biomedical moral enhancement. I argue that Douglas' framework for moral reasoning on which he bases his argument that biomedical intervention is in some cases permissible lacks soundness, and that it apparently undermines morality. Harris insists that morality requires freedom of choice, yet Douglas and Harris have different conceptions of freedom of choice. Douglas' focus on quantity in his defence does not engage with Harris focus on quality of choice. Thus, the kind of biomedical enhancement that Douglas defends is not moral—nor immoral—but amoral enhancement.
Keywords Moral enhancement
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2015-103317
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,556
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Enhancement and Freedom.John Harris - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (2):102-111.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.
Integration of Cognitive and Moral Enhancement.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
The Perils of Moral Enhancement.Aleksandar Dobrijevic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):104-110.
Voluntary Moral Enhancement and the Survival-at-Any-Cost Bias.V. Raki - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):246-250.
Moral Enhancement and Freedom.John Harris - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (2):102-111.
"Voluntary Moral Enhancement and the Survival-at-Any-Cost Bias".Vojin Rakic - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):246-250.
Freedom and Moral Enhancement.M. J. Selgelid - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):215-216.
The Myth of the Moral Enhancement: Back to the Future?Veselin Mitrovic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):111-123.
The Misfortunes of Moral Enhancement.Marco Antonio Azevedo - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (5):461-479.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-16

Total views
7 ( #961,465 of 2,326,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #638,349 of 2,326,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes