Dissertation, Uppsala University (2019)
Abstract |
The present dissertation starts from the general claim that neuroscience is not neutral, with regard to theoretical questions like the nature of consciousness, but it needs to be complemented with dedicated conceptual analysis. Specifically, the argument for this thesis is that the combination of empirical and conceptual work is a necessary step for assessing the significant questions raised by the most recent study of the brain. Results emerging from neuroscience are conceptually very relevant in themselves but, notwithstanding its theoretical sophistication, neuroscience is not sufficient to provide a complete interpretation or an appropriate understanding of their impact. Consequently, the present thesis starts from the need for an interdisciplinary and hybrid field of research, i.e. fundamental neuroethics. Within this framework, the thesis takes consciousness and related disorders and the addicted brain as illustrative cases of the potential fruitful collaboration between empirical and conceptual investigations. The general goal of the thesis is to contribute to the overall development of bridging the gap between empirical and conceptual understandings of consciousness. The first paper sets the theoretical framework, providing an empirically-based description of the brain with significant philosophical implications for an understanding of consciousness. The last three papers of the thesis try to apply the theoretical framework to illustrative cases. Papers II and III analyse the possible application of science and technology for an easier detection and clinical care of patients with disorders of consciousness, with particular attention to communication mediated by neurotechnology and the simulation of the conscious brain, respectively; paper IV provides a potentially new ethical analysis of addiction within the elaborated general conceptual framework. The conclusion of the thesis is that the impact of neuroscientific results needs that a dedicated conceptual approach reveals and investigates their conceptual meaning. This conceptual analysis is not exclusive but integrative and complementary to the empirical science. The case of consciousness, analysed from both an ethical and conceptual point of view, is highly illustrative in this respect. In the end, a conceptual/linguistic work of clarification is urgently needed.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory.David J. Chalmers - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
On a Confusion About a Function of Consciousness.Ned Block - 1995 - Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2):227-–247.
Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind.Michael Tye - 1995 - MIT Press.
Consciousness Explained.Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):905-910.
View all 61 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Preserved Aspects of Consciousness in Disorders of Consciousness A Review and Conceptual Analysis.Jakob Hohwy - 2012 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (3-4):3-4.
The Theoretical and Scientific Problems of Damasio’s Conceptual Model of Consciousness.Luiz Augusto Rosa - 2018 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):83-100.
Do We Need a Theory-Based Assessment of Consciousness in the Field of Disorders of Consciousness?Alexander A. Fingelkurts & Andrew A. Fingelkurts - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:402.
Large-Scale Brain Simulation and Disorders of Consciousness. Mapping Technical and Conceptual Issues.Michele Farisco, Jeanette H. Kotaleski & Kathinka Evers - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
The Ethical Relevance of the Unconscious.Michele Farisco & Kathinka Evers - 2017 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 12:11.
How to Separate Conceptual Issues From Empirical Ones in the Study of Consciousness.Max Velmans - 2008 - In Rahul Banerjee & Bikas Chakrabarti (eds.), Models of Brain and Mind: Physical, Computational, and Psychological Approaches. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 1-9.
Replication of the Hard Problem of Consciousness in AI and Bio-AI: An Early Conceptual Framework.Nicholas Boltuc & Peter Boltuc - 2007 - In Anthony Chella & Ricardo Manzotti (eds.), AI and Consciousness: Theoretical Foundations and Current Approaches. AAAI Press, Merlo Park, CA.
The Intrinsic Activity of the Brain and Its Relation to Levels and Disorders of Consciousness.Farisco Michele, Laureys Steven & Evers Kathinka - 2017 - Mind and Matter 15 (2):197-219.
Freeman's Nonlinear Brain Dynamics and Consciousness.M. Mannino & S. L. Bressler - 2018 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 25 (1-2):64-88.
“Machine” Consciousness and “Artificial” Thought: An Operational Architectonics Model Guided Approach.Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Alexander A. Fingelkurts & Carlos F. H. Neves - 2012 - Brain Research 1428:80-92.
The Spontaneity of Consciousness.Robert Hanna & Evan Thompson - 2010 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 1 (1):125-166.
The Presence of Consciousness in Absence Seizures.Tim Bayne - 2011 - Behavioural Neurology 24 (1):47-53.
Do Consciousness and Attention Have Shared Neural Correlates?Andrea Cavanna & Andrea Nani - 2008 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 14.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-10-17
Total views
15 ( #647,728 of 2,409,608 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,301 of 2,409,608 )
2019-10-17
Total views
15 ( #647,728 of 2,409,608 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,301 of 2,409,608 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads